According to Cointelegraph, within a 24-hour period starting Wednesday, Metaplanet transferred a total of 5,014 bitcoins, valued at approximately $322 million, all to the company’s own custodial addresses, with total network fees amounting to around $8. Gerovich also emphasized that all company addresses are public and that the transfers can be monitored in real time on the blockchain.
This detail precisely illustrates why the "sell-off" theory doesn't hold up. If the goal were to liquidate, the typical path would involve transferring the coins to an exchange hot wallet, not moving them between custodial addresses under one's own control. On-chain data shows that 36,000 out of the 43,000 held coins remain in the outgoing wallet, consistent with the interpretation of a change in custodial arrangements.
Why is the market so jumpy: Strategy and MARA are really selling this year
A routine internal transfer sparked panic—not because of Metaplanet, but due to the broader credit environment in the treasury sector. This week, we reported that Strategy has sold Bitcoin multiple times this year; the largest treasury firm, once claiming it would "never sell," has shifted to "dynamic treasury management," even selling below cost to replenish cash. MARA Digital sold a total of 23,093 BTC in the first half of the year, reversing its previous policy of holding only. Hut8 also transferred 493 BTC out of its treasury, without clarifying whether this was an internal transfer or a precursor to a sale.
In this atmosphere, a large transfer by the world's third-largest listed gold vault company is immediately priced by the market as a precursor to selling — almost reflexively.
"Not selling" doesn't mean "nothing's wrong": Metaplanet's real ledger
Fear is overblown, but Metaplanet’s situation is far from easy. The company holds 43,000 BTC with an average cost of approximately $96,000, while the current BTC price is around $64,000, resulting in an unrealized loss of about $1.4 billion—a decline of over 30%. The stock has fallen more than 43% this year and is trading near 221 yen, close to its historical low.
More critically, momentum has stalled. The company purchased 2,823 BTC in early July and has not added to its holdings since; after issuing $50 million in bonds to major investor EVO Fund in April, there have been no further financing announcements. Current cash reserves stand at approximately $280 million, with liabilities around $400 million. At this pace, achieving the year-end target of holding 100,000 BTC is virtually impossible: there is a shortfall of 57,000 BTC, requiring roughly $3.6 billion in new funding at current prices. The treasury model’s engine relies on “raise funds to buy BTC, BTC price appreciation, then raise again”—but both wheels are now slowing down.
A framework for token holders: How to distinguish between “relocation” and “dumping”
This close call was actually a practical lesson for ordinary coin holders. Next time you see a notification about “a large transfer by an institution,” you can assess it in three steps. First, check the destination: transfers between self-custody addresses are typically internal management; transfers into exchange addresses are closer to a selling signal. Second, check disclosure: companies like Metaplanet, which publicly disclose all addresses and have their CEO appear the same day to share data, offer verifiable transparency; silence and lack of disclosure are red flags. Third, monitor the aftermath: track entity holdings snapshots on platforms like Arkham—genuine selling will leave a trace in the holding numbers.
Returning to the matter itself, the CEO used on-chain data to quell the panic on the spot—an exemplary emotional management move for a treasury company. But conversely, the market’s hypersensitivity is itself a signal: when “large institutional transfers” are automatically interpreted as “they’re running,” it means the treasury narrative has shifted from “buy forever” to “when to sell.” From Strategy openly considering sales, to MARA reversing its policy, to Trump Media canceling its CRO treasury plan, the 2025 belief that “public companies buying crypto equals good news” is gradually receding.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN
BitPush Telegram community: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity
BitPush TG subscription: https://t.me/bitpush
Disclaimer: All articles by BiTui represent the authors' opinions only and do not constitute investment advice.
